Mohammed to Overtake Jack in The Union Jack

http://www.inthenews.co.uk/news/politics/muhammad-second-most-common-baby-name-in-uk-$1095527.htm

Here’s some more good news. It will likely become the most popular name in England by year’s end, if it hasn’t already, because this was an old article.

A more recent op-ed piece from Michelle Malkin puts this in perspective:

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/jihadists-want-mohammed-teddy-bear-blasphemer-executed-kill-her-kill-her-by-firing-squad/

I know, I’m probably being a bigot or a xenophobe in the eyes of some. But, if I am, then what does that make Muslims who want to kill people over jokes? What are people who want to behead a woman over a teddy bear? Is this tolerance and understanding?
And does it bother anyone that so many of these families are not productive? That their sole purpose seems to be…breeding? Read:
http://commonsenseagainstislam.websanon.com/?p=162

The most chilling line? “The repression of womenfolk has also led some Muslim men to view vulnerable young women from outside the faith as sub-human sexual fodder fit only to be used and abused”

I have seen this elsewhere.

This is why we’re in trouble…while the Brits, our closest ally in Europe, are too busy drinking themselves stupid and fornicating, Muslims are moving there and having fifteen children…in a generation we won’t recognize England.

Canada is next:

http://theopinionator.typepad.com/my_weblog/islam_in_world/index.html

I’m all for immigration. I have nothing against any race. If you want to move to a country, including the USA, and integrate, work and be part of the society, good for you. That’s what built America. You can bring your religion, too.
God is good.
But when so many people of one religion preach hatred and violence, you can’t allow them to usurp your country through overpopulation. If you think Sharia law is something you can live under safely if you’re non-Muslim, read this. This is especially frightening for women:

http://www.faithfreedom.org/Announcement/601081013.htm

As the article asks, why did Amnesty International do nothing to help this woman? All she did was defend herself from three savage rapists…for that she is sentenced to death. Meanwhile, the PC Amnesty group seems concerned only with wrongs done by the west in Guantanamo.

Iran is not the exception.

http://www.womensassistance.com/index.php?page=factsinfo2.html

At least in Pakistan, they recently changed the laws, but as you can, hard line Muslims were infuriated:

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/433D0A50-47A3-4995-8B5B-770AFE71B16A.htm

This is why, for all his flaws, I appreciate Pervez Musharraf.

Why are we in the west more afraid of offending anyone than of losing our country, our lives?